Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-5.3 Codex

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.57/100
Margin
25.1pts
winning →
66.69/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 3 27B #164 (Supported); GPT-5.3 Codex #26 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 3 27B and GPT-5.3 Codex share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Gemma 3 27B; 9 to GPT-5.3 Codex.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemma 3 27B only
4
GPT-5.3 Codex only
9
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 3 27B and GPT-5.3 Codex is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.3 Codex is priced at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 3 27B. GPT-5.3 Codex has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 32K for Gemma 3 27B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 3 27B and GPT-5.3 Codex
CategoryGemma 3 27BΔGPT-5.3 Codex
AgenticGemma 3 27BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.3 Codex71.4
CodingGemma 3 27BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.3 Codex67.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 3 27BGPT-5.3 CodexComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 3 27B$0 input / $0 outputGPT-5.3 Codex$1.75 input / $14 outputGemma 3 27B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 3 27B31 tok/sGPT-5.3 Codex79 tok/sGPT-5.3 Codex has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 3 27B2.04 sGPT-5.3 Codex88.26 sGemma 3 27B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 3 27B32KGPT-5.3 Codex400KGPT-5.3 Codex lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 0.3%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 10.5%86%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource -144Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 64.7%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 57.47%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 33.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA Coding IndexSource 10.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 21.2%53.2%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 85%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 58.2%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 61.77%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA-LCRSource 5.7%74.0%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
CritPtSource 0.0%16.9%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGPT-5.3 CodexResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.4%44.3%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.8%91.5%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-HLESource 4.7%39.9%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -65.9%9.9%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 12.5%51.8%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.5%86.9%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.0%78.5%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1195Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA-IFBenchSource 31.8%75.4%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 3 27B and GPT-5.3 Codex on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 3 27B and GPT-5.3 Codex today?

Gemma 3 27B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.3 Codex: $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.