Model comparison
Gemma 3 27B vs Inkling
Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 3 27B unranked; Inkling #17
BenchAlign evidence: Gemma 3 27B supported; Inkling not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemma 3 27B and Inkling share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Gemma 3 27B; 18 to Inkling.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 14
- Gemma 3 27B only
- 3
- Inkling only
- 18
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemma 3 27B and Inkling is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Inkling is priced at $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 3 27B. Inkling has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 32K for Gemma 3 27B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemma 3 27B | Δ | Inkling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Gemma 3 27BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling69.4 |
| Coding | Gemma 3 27BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling68.6 |
| Knowledge | Gemma 3 27BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling51.7 |
| Math | Gemma 3 27BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling97.1 |
| Multimodal | Gemma 3 27BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling76.5 |
| Inst. Following | Gemma 3 27BNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling79.8 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemma 3 27B | Inkling | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemma 3 27B$0 input / $0 output | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | Gemma 3 27B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemma 3 27B31 tok/s | InklingNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemma 3 27B2.04 s | InklingNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemma 3 27B32K | Inkling1M | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 0.3% | 32.3% | Inkling leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 10.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 0.0% | 36.9% | Inkling leads |
| GDPval-AASource | -144 | 1239 | Inkling leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 74.1% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource | — | 1258 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 836 | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 23.7% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 7.4% | 40.7% | Inkling leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 42.8% | 87.2% | Inkling leads |
| AA-HLESource | 4.7% | 29.7% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -65.9% | 2.1% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 12.5% | 40.0% | Inkling leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 89.5% | 63.1% | Inkling leads |
| GPQASource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 46% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 30% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | — | 97.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemma 3 27B and Inkling on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemma 3 27B and Inkling today?
Gemma 3 27B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Inkling: $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.