Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 4 Scout

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.57/100
Margin
1.7pts
← winning
39.87/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 3 27B #164 (Supported); Llama 4 Scout #174 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 3 27B and Llama 4 Scout share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Gemma 3 27B; 2 to Llama 4 Scout.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
16
Gemma 3 27B only
0
Llama 4 Scout only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 3 27B and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 32K for Gemma 3 27B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 3 27BLlama 4 ScoutComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 3 27B$0 input / $0 outputLlama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 3 27B31 tok/sLlama 4 Scout128 tok/sLlama 4 Scout has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 3 27B2.04 sLlama 4 Scout0.70 sLlama 4 Scout reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 3 27B32KLlama 4 Scout10MLlama 4 Scout lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 0.3%1.1%Llama 4 Scout leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 10.5%15.5%Llama 4 Scout leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%0.0%Tie
GDPval-AASource -14490Llama 4 Scout leads
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA Coding IndexSource 10.1%8.2%Gemma 3 27B leads
AA-SciCodeSource 21.2%17.0%Gemma 3 27B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA-LCRSource 5.7%25.8%Llama 4 Scout leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 4 ScoutResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.4%10.0%Llama 4 Scout leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.8%58.7%Llama 4 Scout leads
AA-HLESource 4.7%4.3%Gemma 3 27B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -65.9%-52.4%Llama 4 Scout leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 12.5%14.6%Llama 4 Scout leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.5%78.3%Llama 4 Scout leads
Math
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 4 ScoutResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.0%52.9%Llama 4 Scout leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 783Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA-IFBenchSource 31.8%39.5%Llama 4 Scout leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 3 27B and Llama 4 Scout on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 3 27B and Llama 4 Scout today?

Gemma 3 27B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 3 27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Llama 4 Scout
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.