Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.41/100
Margin
18.6pts
winning →
60/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 3 27B unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24

BenchAlign evidence: Gemma 3 27B supported; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Gemma 3 27B; 23 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
16
Gemma 3 27B only
1
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
23
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3 Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Nemotron 3 Ultra has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 32K for Gemma 3 27B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
CategoryGemma 3 27BΔNemotron 3 Ultra
AgenticGemma 3 27BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra51.3
CodingGemma 3 27BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra58.3
ReasoningGemma 3 27BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra61.9
KnowledgeGemma 3 27BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra54.2
MultilingualGemma 3 27BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra83.0
Inst. FollowingGemma 3 27BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra81.7

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 3 27B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 3 27B31 tok/sNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 3 27B2.04 sNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 3 27B32KNemotron 3 Ultra1MNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 0.3%27.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 10.5%83.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%33.2%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GDPval-AASource -1441164Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource 90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA Coding IndexSource 10.1%49.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Terminal-Bench HardSource 3.8%36.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-SciCodeSource 21.2%39.9%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 5.7%67.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
CritPtSource 0.0%3.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
LongBench v2Source 61.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 UltraResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 7.4%37.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.8%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-HLESource 4.7%26.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -65.9%-0.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 12.5%21.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.5%28.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GPQASource 87%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.0%Not comparable
HLESource 26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 86.8%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 UltraResult
MMLU-ProXSource 83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.0%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1132Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-IFBenchSource 31.8%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
IFBenchSource 81.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3 Ultra on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3 Ultra today?

Gemma 3 27B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.