Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 12B vs GPT-5.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.29/100
Margin
6.4pts
winning →
OpenAI
53.65/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B #137 (Estimated); GPT-5.1 #94 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 12B and GPT-5.1 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Gemma 4 12B; 9 to GPT-5.1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemma 4 12B only
11
GPT-5.1 only
9
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick GPT-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.1 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 53.65 to 47.29. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemma 4 12B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GPT-5.1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 12B and GPT-5.1
CategoryGemma 4 12BΔGPT-5.1
MathGemma 4 12B77.5Margin 51.1GPT-5.126.4
ReasoningGemma 4 12B43.4MarginNo overlapGPT-5.1Not measured
KnowledgeGemma 4 12B77.5MarginNo overlapGPT-5.1Not measured
MultimodalGemma 4 12B69.1MarginNo overlapGPT-5.1Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 12BGPT-5.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 12BNot availableGPT-5.1$1.25 input / $10 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 12BNot availableGPT-5.1111 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 12BNot availableGPT-5.157.47 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 12B256KGPT-5.1200KGemma 4 12B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-5.1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.3%81.9%GPT-5.1 leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.0%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 41.24%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 24.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 987Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-5.1Result
AA-SciCodeSource 38.2%43.3%GPT-5.1 leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 24.61%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-5.1Result
BBHSource 53%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source 43.4%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 55.3%75.0%GPT-5.1 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%4.9%GPT-5.1 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-5.1Result
GPQASource 78.8%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 78.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 77.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 5.2%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 22.0%36.9%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.3%87.3%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-HLESource 14.8%26.5%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.9%5.6%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 16.0%37.6%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.8%51.3%GPT-5.1 leads
MathGemma 4 12B wins
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-5.1Result
AIME26Source 77.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 31.034%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 12.500%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-5.1Result
MMMU-ProSource 69.1%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 79.7%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 48.7%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.7%75.5%GPT-5.1 leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1217Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-5.1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 73.5%72.9%Gemma 4 12B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or GPT-5.1?

GPT-5.1 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 53.65 to 47.29.

Which is better for math, Gemma 4 12B or GPT-5.1?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 26.4. GPT-5.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.