Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 12B vs K-Exaone

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

52/100
Margin
1.0pts
winning →
LG AI Research
53/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 12B and K-Exaone share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to Gemma 4 12B; 0 to K-Exaone.

Updated July 14, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemma 4 12B only
13
K-Exaone only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 4 12B and K-Exaone is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 12B and K-Exaone
CategoryGemma 4 12BΔK-Exaone
CodingGemma 4 12B72.0MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured
ReasoningGemma 4 12B43.4MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured
KnowledgeGemma 4 12B77.5MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured
MathGemma 4 12B77.5MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured
MultimodalGemma 4 12B69.1MarginNo overlapK-ExaoneNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 12BK-ExaoneComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 12BNot availableK-ExaoneNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 12BNot availableK-ExaoneNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 12BNot availableK-ExaoneNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 12B256KK-Exaone256KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BK-ExaoneResult
Tau2-TelecomSource 36.3%74.3%K-Exaone leads
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BK-ExaoneResult
LiveCodeBenchSource 72%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 18.2%22.7%K-Exaone leads
AA-SciCodeSource 38.2%35.6%Gemma 4 12B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BK-ExaoneResult
BBHSource 53%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source 43.4%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 55.3%55.7%K-Exaone leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.1%K-Exaone leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BK-ExaoneResult
GPQASource 78.8%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 78.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 77.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 5.2%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 22.0%24.7%K-Exaone leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.3%78.3%K-Exaone leads
AA-HLESource 14.8%13.1%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.9%-57.9%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 16.0%16.5%K-Exaone leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.8%89.1%Gemma 4 12B leads
Math
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BK-ExaoneResult
AIME26Source 77.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BK-ExaoneResult
MMMU-ProSource 69.1%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 79.7%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 48.7%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BK-ExaoneResult
AA-IFBenchSource 73.5%64.7%Gemma 4 12B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Gemma 4 12B and K-Exaone on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 14, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.