Model comparison
Gemma 4 12B vs Llama 4 Scout
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B #137 (Estimated); Llama 4 Scout #174 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Gemma 4 12B and Llama 4 Scout share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Gemma 4 12B; 6 to Llama 4 Scout.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- Gemma 4 12B only
- 11
- Llama 4 Scout only
- 6
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Gemma 4 12B and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 12B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Gemma 4 12B | Δ | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | Gemma 4 12B43.4 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
| Knowledge | Gemma 4 12B77.5 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
| Math | Gemma 4 12B77.5 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
| Multimodal | Gemma 4 12B69.1 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 4 ScoutNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Gemma 4 12B | Llama 4 Scout | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Gemma 4 12BNot available | Llama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Gemma 4 12BNot available | Llama 4 Scout128 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Gemma 4 12BNot available | Llama 4 Scout0.70 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Gemma 4 12B256K | Llama 4 Scout10M | Llama 4 Scout lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning4 benchmarks
Knowledge11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 12B | Llama 4 Scout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 78.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 78.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 77.2% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 5.2% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | 83.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 22.0% | 10.0% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 75.3% | 58.7% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
| AA-HLESource | 14.8% | 4.3% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -51.9% | -52.4% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 16.0% | 14.6% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 80.8% | 78.3% | Llama 4 Scout leads |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal5 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 12B | Llama 4 Scout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 73.5% | 39.5% | Gemma 4 12B leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Gemma 4 12B and Llama 4 Scout on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Gemma 4 12B and Llama 4 Scout today?
Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Self-host vs API cost
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.