Skip to main content

Gemma 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 12B

53

VS

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

86

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Breakdown

Coding

Gemma 4 12B
72vs57.2

+14.8 difference

Knowledge

Gemma 4 12B
77.8vs48

+29.8 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 12B

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 86 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 12B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 86 to 53.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 12B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.8 versus 48. Inside this category, HLE w/o tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 12B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 57.2. MiMo-V2.5-Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.