Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 12B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.29/100
Margin
5.6pts
winning →
52.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B #137 (Estimated); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 12B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Gemma 4 12B; 4 to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
Gemma 4 12B only
12
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 4 12B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemma 4 12B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 12B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
CategoryGemma 4 12BΔNemotron 3 Nano 30B
ReasoningGemma 4 12B43.4MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
KnowledgeGemma 4 12B77.5MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
MathGemma 4 12B77.5MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
MultimodalGemma 4 12B69.1MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 12BNemotron 3 Nano 30BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 12BNot availableNemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 12BNot availableNemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 12BNot availableNemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 12B256KNemotron 3 Nano 30B32KGemma 4 12B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.3%40.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 484Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 2.0%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 38.2%29.6%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA Coding IndexSource 14.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
BBHSource 53%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source 43.4%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 55.3%33.7%Gemma 4 12B leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
GPQASource 78.8%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 78.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 77.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 5.2%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 22.0%14.2%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.3%75.7%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
AA-HLESource 14.8%10.2%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.9%-51.6%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 16.0%17.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.8%82.9%Gemma 4 12B leads
Math
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AIME26Source 77.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
MMMU-ProSource 69.1%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 79.7%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 48.7%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 73.5%71.1%Gemma 4 12B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 4 12B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 4 12B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B today?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.