Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 12B vs o1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.29/100
Margin
0.8pts
winning →
OpenAI
48.1/100
2 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B #137 (Estimated); o1 #129 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 12B and o1 share 12 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Gemma 4 12B; 4 to o1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemma 4 12B only
11
o1 only
4
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Pick o1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

o1 has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 48.1 versus 47.29. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Gemma 4 12B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for o1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 12B and o1
CategoryGemma 4 12BΔo1
MathGemma 4 12B77.5Margin 68.2o19.3
KnowledgeGemma 4 12B77.5Margin 1.8o175.7
ReasoningGemma 4 12B43.4MarginNo overlapo1Not measured
MultimodalGemma 4 12B69.1MarginNo overlapo1Not measured
Inst. FollowingGemma 4 12BNot measuredMarginNo overlapo192.2

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemma 4 12BB · o1
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 78.8%B 75.7%
    Winner: Gemma 4 12BΔ 3.1
    GPQA: Gemma 4 12B scored 78.8%; o1 scored 75.7%. Gemma 4 12B wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 12Bo1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 12BNot availableo1$15 input / $60 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 12BNot availableo198 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 12BNot availableo132.29 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 12B256Ko1200KGemma 4 12B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 12Bo1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.3%62.6%o1 leads
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 12Bo1Result
AA-SciCodeSource 38.2%35.8%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA Coding IndexSource 39.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 12Bo1Result
BBHSource 53%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source 43.4%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 55.3%59.3%o1 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.3%o1 leads
KnowledgeGemma 4 12B wins
BenchmarkGemma 4 12Bo1Result
GPQASource 78.8%75.7%Gemma 4 12B leads
GPQA-DSource 78.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 77.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 5.2%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 22.0%23.4%o1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.3%74.7%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-HLESource 14.8%7.7%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.9%-10.5%o1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 16.0%34.7%o1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.8%69.3%o1 leads
MMLUSource 91.8%Not comparable
MathGemma 4 12B wins
BenchmarkGemma 4 12Bo1Result
AIME26Source 77.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 9.310%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 12Bo1Result
MMMU-ProSource 69.1%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 79.7%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 48.7%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 12Bo1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 73.5%70.3%Gemma 4 12B leads
IFEvalSource 92.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or o1?

o1 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 48.1 to 47.29. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 78.8% and 75.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 12B or o1?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 75.7. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Gemma 4 12B or o1?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 9.3. o1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.