Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 12B vs Ornith-1.0-397B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
47.15/100
Margin
24.9pts
winning →
DeepReinforce AI
72/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B #135 (Estimated); Ornith-1.0-397B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 12B and Ornith-1.0-397B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 25 results are unique to Gemma 4 12B; 7 to Ornith-1.0-397B.

Updated July 17, 2026
Shared results
0
Gemma 4 12B only
25
Ornith-1.0-397B only
7
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 4 12B and Ornith-1.0-397B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 12BOrnith-1.0-397BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 12BNot availableOrnith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 12BNot availableOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 12BNot availableOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 12B256KOrnith-1.0-397B256KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BOrnith-1.0-397BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 77.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BOrnith-1.0-397BResult
LiveCodeBench v6Source 72.0%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 18.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.2%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 82.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 62.2%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.9%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 48.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BOrnith-1.0-397BResult
BBHSource 53%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source 43.4%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 55.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BOrnith-1.0-397BResult
GPQASource 78.8%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 78.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 77.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 5.2%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 22.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 14.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 16.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BOrnith-1.0-397BResult
AIME26Source 77.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BOrnith-1.0-397BResult
MMMU-ProSource 69.1%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 79.7%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 48.7%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BOrnith-1.0-397BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 73.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 4 12B and Ornith-1.0-397B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 4 12B and Ornith-1.0-397B today?

Ornith-1.0-397B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 17, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.