Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemma 4 26B A4B
55
Kimi K2.6
85
Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 26B A4B unranked · Kimi K2.6 #9
Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Knowledge
+4.6 difference
Multimodal
+5.9 difference
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Kimi K2.6
$0 / $0
$0.95 / $4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
256K
Pick Kimi K2.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Kimi K2.6 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 85 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Kimi K2.6's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 79.7 against 73.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 17.2% to 34.7%.
Kimi K2.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 26B A4B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.
Kimi K2.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 85 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 17.2% and 34.7%.
Kimi K2.6 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.8 versus 49.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Kimi K2.6 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.7 versus 73.8. Inside this category, AA-MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.