Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.96/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 26B A4B #67 (Supported); LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 26B A4B and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to Gemma 4 26B A4B; 3 to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
8
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
3
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 4 26B A4B and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 26B A4B and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract
CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BΔLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract
KnowledgeGemma 4 26B A4B43.4MarginNo overlapLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured
MultimodalGemma 4 26B A4B73.8MarginNo overlapLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4BLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 26B A4B$0 input / $0 outputLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 26B A4BNot availableLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 26B A4BNot availableLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 26B A4B256KLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128KGemma 4 26B A4B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 11.0%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 43.6%8.5%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
GDPval-AASource 13.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 761Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA Coding IndexSource 39.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 40.0%3.0%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-LCRSource 55.7%0.0%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
MMLU-ProSource 82.6%Not comparable
HLESource 17.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 8.7%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.7%1.0%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 79.2%28.9%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
AA-HLESource 18.3%5.1%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -48.1%-83.9%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 18.2%5.2%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.9%94.0%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
MMMU-ProSource 73.8%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.2%26.5%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
Liquid Extract JSON ValiditySource 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract F1Source 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract VLM JudgeSource 90.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-IFBenchSource 72.4%33.1%Gemma 4 26B A4B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 4 26B A4B and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract today?

Gemma 4 26B A4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.