Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
57.96/100
No comparison
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 26B A4B #67 (Supported); Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 20 results are unique to Gemma 4 26B A4B; 5 to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
20
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking only
5
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Gemma 4 26B A4B makes more sense if you need the larger 256K context window; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Gemma 4 26B A4B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 26B A4BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 26B A4B$0 input / $0 outputMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 26B A4BNot availableMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 26B A4BNot availableMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 26B A4B256KMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking128KGemma 4 26B A4B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 11.0%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 43.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 13.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 761Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 45.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
AA Coding IndexSource 39.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 40.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
AA-LCRSource 55.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
KnowledgeMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking wins
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
MMLU-ProSource 82.6%Not comparable
HLESource 17.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 8.7%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 79.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 18.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -48.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 18.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.9%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 86.2%Not comparable
GPQASource 57.6%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 57.6%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
MMMU-ProSource 73.8%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.2%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMellum2-12B-A2.5B-ThinkingResult
AA-IFBenchSource 72.4%Not comparable
IFEvalSource 76.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 57.6 versus 43.4. Gemma 4 26B A4B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.