Skip to main content

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

55

VS

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

86

1 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

Gemma 4 26B A4B
49.2vs48

+1.2 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 26B A4B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 86 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 26B A4B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 86 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 17.2% and 48%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 49.2 versus 48. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.