Skip to main content

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniCPM5-1B

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads for most workloads.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

56

VS

MiniCPM5-1B

36

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniCPM5-1B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BΔMiniCPM5-1B
Knowledge43.8 0.344.1
Math33.1
Multimodal73.8
Inst. Following58.5

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B

MiniCPM5-1B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

131K

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniCPM5-1B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Gemma 4 26B A4B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 56 to 36. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemma 4 26B A4B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 131K for MiniCPM5-1B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiniCPM5-1B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 56 to 36. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 82.6% and 48.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiniCPM5-1B?

MiniCPM5-1B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 44.1 versus 43.8. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.