Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5.2

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

62

VS

GPT-5.2

79

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

GPT-5.2
41.6vs64.7

+23.1 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.2
61.3vs92.4

+31.1 difference

Multimodal

GPT-5.2
76.9vs80.3

+3.4 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

GPT-5.2

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$1.75 / $14

Speed

N/A

73 t/s

Latency (first answer)

N/A

130.34s

Context Window

256K

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 79 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 61.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 84.3% to 92.4%.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 31B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.3% and 92.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 61.3. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.7 versus 41.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.3 versus 76.9. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
GPT-5.2
API / mo$11,813
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 4, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.