Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5.2

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

65

VS

GPT-5.2

80

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

GPT-5.2
41.6vs64.7

+23.1 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.2
61.3vs92.4

+31.1 difference

Multimodal

GPT-5.2
76.9vs80.3

+3.4 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

GPT-5.2

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$1.75 / $14

Speed

N/A

73 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

130.34s

Context Window

256K

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 80 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 61.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 84.3% to 92.4%.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 31B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 80 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.3% and 92.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 61.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.7 versus 41.6. Gemma 4 31B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemma 4 31B or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.3 versus 76.9. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
GPT-5.2
API / mo$11,813
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.