Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemma 4 31B
65
Hy3 Preview
62
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Coding
+18.4 difference
Knowledge
+14.6 difference
Gemma 4 31B
Hy3 Preview
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
256K
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Gemma 4 31B has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 65 versus 62. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Gemma 4 31B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 61.3 against 46.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 84.3% to 87.2%. Hy3 Preview does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Gemma 4 31B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.3% and 87.2%.
Gemma 4 31B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 46.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Hy3 Preview has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60 versus 41.6. Gemma 4 31B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.