Capability
42.8/100
field median 57.5
#168 of 216 ranked models
Superseded.Tencent has newer models in this line:Hy3
Model profile · Tencent
Hy3 Preview
Released Apr 23, 2026 — see all recent releases
Hy3 Preview scores 42.8 out of 100 and ranks #168 of 216. This profile shows 6 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #73. Published weights can be self-hosted, but infrastructure cost varies and is not a comparable API token rate.
Data as of August 7, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Agentic ranks #73. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Validate before choosing
6 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 89 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
256Ktokens
field median 201,500
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Hy3 Preview category percentile values
- Agentic45th percentile
- Coding33rd percentile
- ReasoningNot eligible
- KnowledgeNot eligible
- MathNot eligible
- MultilingualNot eligible
- MultimodalNot eligible
- Instruction followingNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- Agentic#73/132
- Coding#89/132
- ReasoningNot ranked
- KnowledgeNot ranked
- MathNot ranked
- MultilingualNot ranked
- MultimodalNot ranked
- Inst. FollowingNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic2/2 verified
- Coding2/2 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- Knowledge2/2 verified
- MathNot measured
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 256K
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not sourced yet
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Superseded
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Open weights available; hardware estimate not sourced
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Deployment options
Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.
Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.
Estimate VRAM from known parametersCategory score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #73 of 132Percentile 45thWeight 22%2 benchmarksVerified | 45.7 | #73 of 132 | 45th | 22% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #89 of 132Percentile 33rdWeight 20%2 benchmarksVerified | 45.8 | #89 of 132 | 33rd | 20% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%2 benchmarksVerified | 38.9 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score74.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap21.6 behind | WeightWeighted 16% | Provider exact |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score54.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9% | Gap37.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Agentic2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score54.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9% | Gap37.5 behind | WeightWeighted 38% | Provider exact |
| Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | Score36.91% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97% | Gap36.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Knowledge2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score87.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5% | Gap8.3 behind | WeightWeighted 7% | Provider exact |
| GPQA-DGPQA Diamond | Score87.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5% | Gap8.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Apr 23, 2026 · you are here
Hy3 PreviewScore 42.8 · Price not listed
Jul 6, 2026
Hy3Not publicly ranked · Price not listed
preview · preview
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Hy3 Preview ranks #168 of 216 on the public leaderboard with a score of 42.8/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.
Hy3 Preview is a open weight model with a 256K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Hy3 Preview sits in the Hy3 family with Hy3. 6 of 381 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #73, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #89. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Radar
Full release historyHy3 Preview release history
Hy3 Preview released
Tencent · Model release
Source confirmed
Frequently asked questions
How does Hy3 Preview perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Hy3 Preview ranks #168 out of 216 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 42.8/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 6 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is Hy3 Preview good for knowledge and understanding?
Hy3 Preview has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Hy3 Preview good for coding and programming?
Hy3 Preview ranks #89 out of 132 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 45.8/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Hy3 Preview good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Hy3 Preview ranks #73 out of 132 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 45.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Hy3 Preview open source?
Hy3 Preview is an open-weight model from Tencent. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.
Which sibling models are related to Hy3 Preview?
Hy3 Preview belongs to the Hy3 family. Related tracked variants include Hy3. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
Does Hy3 Preview have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Hy3 Preview currently has 22 source-displayable rows across 381 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Hy3 Preview?
Hy3 Preview has a reported context window of 256K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Last updated August 7, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Hy3 Preview in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.