Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemma 4 31B
64
Ornith-1.0-9B
52
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-9B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.
Coding
+27.8 difference
Gemma 4 31B
Ornith-1.0-9B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
262K
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-9B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.
Gemma 4 31B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 64 to 52. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Ornith-1.0-9B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.
Gemma 4 31B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 64 to 52.
Ornith-1.0-9B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.4 versus 41.6. Gemma 4 31B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.