Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.6-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

66

VS

Qwen3.6-27B

72

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 31B unranked · Qwen3.6-27B #10

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Qwen3.6-27B
41.6vs70.6

+29.0 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6-27B
61.3vs62.2

+0.9 difference

Multimodal

Gemma 4 31B
76.9vs75.8

+1.1 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

Qwen3.6-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Qwen3.6-27B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.6-27B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 70.6 against 41.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 84.3% to 87.8%. Gemma 4 31B does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6-27B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.3% and 87.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.2 versus 61.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 41.6. Gemma 4 31B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Gemma 4 31B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.9 versus 75.8. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.