Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

64

VS

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

66

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 31B unranked · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #23

Pick Qwen3.6-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
41.6vs66.9

+25.3 difference

Knowledge

Gemma 4 31B
61.3vs60.5

+0.8 difference

Multimodal

Gemma 4 31B
76.9vs76.1

+0.8 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 66 versus 64. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 66.9 against 41.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 26.5% to 21.4%. Gemma 4 31B does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 66 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 26.5% and 21.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Gemma 4 31B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 60.5. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 66.9 versus 41.6. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Gemma 4 31B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.9 versus 76.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 28, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.