Skip to main content

Gemma 4 E2B vs Hy3 Preview

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 E2B

27

VS

Hy3 Preview

62

1 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E2B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

Gemma 4 E2B
54.1vs46.7

+7.4 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 E2B

Hy3 Preview

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

128K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Hy3 Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E2B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Hy3 Preview is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 62 to 27. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Hy3 Preview gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E2B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or Hy3 Preview?

Hy3 Preview is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 27. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 43.4% and 87.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 E2B or Hy3 Preview?

Gemma 4 E2B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.1 versus 46.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 11, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.