Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 E2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.65/100
Margin
18.4pts
winning →
60/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 E2B unranked; Nemotron 3 Ultra #24

BenchAlign evidence: Gemma 4 E2B estimated; Nemotron 3 Ultra not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 E2B and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 14 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Gemma 4 E2B; 25 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
14
Gemma 4 E2B only
1
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
25
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E2B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Nemotron 3 Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 60 to 34. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E2B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 E2B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
CategoryGemma 4 E2BΔNemotron 3 Ultra
KnowledgeGemma 4 E2B56.9Margin 2.7Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2
AgenticGemma 4 E2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra51.3
CodingGemma 4 E2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra58.3
ReasoningGemma 4 E2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra61.9
MultilingualGemma 4 E2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra83.0
Inst. FollowingGemma 4 E2BNot measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra81.7

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemma 4 E2BB · Nemotron 3 Ultra
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 43.4%B 87%
    Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 43.6
    GPQA: Gemma 4 E2B scored 43.4%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.
  2. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 60%B 86.8%
    Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 26.8
    MMLU-Pro: Gemma 4 E2B scored 60%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 86.8%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 E2BNemotron 3 UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 E2B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 E2BNot availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 E2BNot availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 E2B128KNemotron 3 Ultra1MNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 E2BNemotron 3 UltraResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 20.8%83.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource 90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1164Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 3.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 E2BNemotron 3 UltraResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 3.0%36.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-SciCodeSource 20.9%39.9%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 89.0%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 E2BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 15.0%67.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
CritPtSource 0.0%3.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
LongBench v2Source 61.9%Not comparable
KnowledgeGemma 4 E2B wins
BenchmarkGemma 4 E2BNemotron 3 UltraResult
GPQASource 43.4%87%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
MMLU-ProSource 60%86.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.3%37.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 43.3%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-HLESource 4.8%26.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -24.0%-0.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 6.7%21.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 32.9%28.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GPQA-DSource 87.0%Not comparable
HLESource 26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemma 4 E2BNemotron 3 UltraResult
MMLU-ProXSource 83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 E2BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 44.6%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1132Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 E2BNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-IFBenchSource 38.0%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
IFBenchSource 81.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 60 to 34. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 43.4% and 87%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 E2B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Gemma 4 E2B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.9 versus 54.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.