Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 E4B vs GLM-4.6

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

43.2/100
Margin
11.9pts
winning →
55.12/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 E4B #155 (Estimated); GLM-4.6 #85 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 E4B and GLM-4.6 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Gemma 4 E4B; 3 to GLM-4.6.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
Gemma 4 E4B only
3
GLM-4.6 only
3
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 4 E4B and GLM-4.6 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GLM-4.6 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E4B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 E4B and GLM-4.6
CategoryGemma 4 E4BΔGLM-4.6
KnowledgeGemma 4 E4B67.4MarginNo overlapGLM-4.6Not measured
MathGemma 4 E4BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGLM-4.63.4

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 E4BGLM-4.6Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 E4B$0 input / $0 outputGLM-4.6Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 E4BNot availableGLM-4.6Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 E4BNot availableGLM-4.6Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 E4B128KGLM-4.6200KGLM-4.6 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGLM-4.6Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 20.8%76.9%GLM-4.6 leads
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGLM-4.6Result
AA-SciCodeSource 24.4%33.1%GLM-4.6 leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 3.09%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGLM-4.6Result
AA-LCRSource 30.7%26.3%Gemma 4 E4B leads
CritPtSource 0.6%0.0%Gemma 4 E4B leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGLM-4.6Result
GPQASource 58.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 69.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 12.5%23.0%GLM-4.6 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 57.6%63.2%GLM-4.6 leads
AA-HLESource 3.7%5.2%GLM-4.6 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -20.0%-31.6%Gemma 4 E4B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 8.6%20.8%GLM-4.6 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 31.3%66.1%Gemma 4 E4B leads
Math
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGLM-4.6Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 3.819%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.128%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGLM-4.6Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 51.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGLM-4.6Result
AA-IFBenchSource 44.2%36.7%Gemma 4 E4B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 4 E4B and GLM-4.6 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 4 E4B and GLM-4.6 today?

Gemma 4 E4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.