Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 E4B vs Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

43.2/100
Margin
17.3pts
winning →
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 E4B #155 (Estimated); Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) #48 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 E4B and Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Gemma 4 E4B; 1 to Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemma 4 E4B only
2
Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemma 4 E4B and Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E4B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 E4B and Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)
CategoryGemma 4 E4BΔGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)
KnowledgeGemma 4 E4B67.4MarginNo overlapGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 E4BGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 E4B$0 input / $0 outputGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 E4BNot availableGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 E4BNot availableGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 E4B128KGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)2MGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 20.8%93.3%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-SciCodeSource 24.4%44.2%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 1.20%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 30.7%68.0%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 0.6%2.9%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Result
GPQASource 58.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 69.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 12.5%30.6%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 57.6%85.3%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 3.7%17.6%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -20.0%-28.7%Gemma 4 E4B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 8.6%25.3%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 31.3%72.4%Gemma 4 E4B leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 51.4%63.3%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 E4BGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 44.2%52.7%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemma 4 E4B and Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemma 4 E4B and Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) today?

Gemma 4 E4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.