Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemma 4 E4B
36
LFM2.5-VL-450M
0
Pick Gemma 4 E4B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-VL-450M only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Knowledge
+44.0 difference
Gemma 4 E4B
LFM2.5-VL-450M
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
128K
Pick Gemma 4 E4B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2.5-VL-450M only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Gemma 4 E4B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 36 to 0. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemma 4 E4B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 65.6 against 21.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 69.4% to 19.3%.
Gemma 4 E4B is the reasoning model in the pair, while LFM2.5-VL-450M is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Gemma 4 E4B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 36 to 0. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 69.4% and 19.3%.
Gemma 4 E4B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.6 versus 21.6. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.