Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
GPT-4o mini is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 43 to 37. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-4o mini's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 87.2 against 19. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HumanEval, 87.2 to 27.
Pick GPT-4o mini if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.5-Air only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
GPT-4o mini
82
GLM-4.5-Air
31
GPT-4o mini
87.2
GLM-4.5-Air
19
GPT-4o mini
87
GLM-4.5-Air
63
GPT-4o mini is ahead overall, 43 to 37. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 87.2 and 27.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 82 versus 31. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 87.2 versus 19. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 63. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.