Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.7/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.5-Air #133 (Supported); LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.5-Air and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GLM-4.5-Air; 4 to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
GLM-4.5-Air only
1
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.5-Air and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.5-AirLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.5-Air$0.2 input / $1.1 outputLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.5-Air106 tok/sLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.5-Air1.18 sLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.5-Air128KLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 46.5%8.5%GLM-4.5-Air leads
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-SciCodeSource 30.6%3.0%GLM-4.5-Air leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-LCRSource 43.7%0.0%GLM-4.5-Air leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 16.5%1.0%GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 73.3%28.9%GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-HLESource 6.8%5.1%GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -62.5%-83.9%GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.5%5.2%GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 92.3%94.0%GLM-4.5-Air leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1176Not comparable
Liquid Extract JSON ValiditySource 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract F1Source 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract VLM JudgeSource 90.6%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 26.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-IFBenchSource 37.6%33.1%GLM-4.5-Air leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.5-Air and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.5-Air and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract today?

GLM-4.5-Air: $0.20 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.