Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral Large 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.7/100
Margin
5.9pts
← winning
41.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.5-Air #133 (Supported); Mistral Large 2 #163 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.5-Air and Mistral Large 2 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GLM-4.5-Air; 0 to Mistral Large 2.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
GLM-4.5-Air only
1
Mistral Large 2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.5-Air and Mistral Large 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.5-AirMistral Large 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.5-Air$0.2 input / $1.1 outputMistral Large 2Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.5-Air106 tok/sMistral Large 238 tok/sGLM-4.5-Air has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.5-Air1.18 sMistral Large 21.45 sGLM-4.5-Air reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.5-Air128KMistral Large 2128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMistral Large 2Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 46.5%30.7%GLM-4.5-Air leads
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMistral Large 2Result
AA-SciCodeSource 30.6%29.2%GLM-4.5-Air leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMistral Large 2Result
AA-LCRSource 43.7%5.3%GLM-4.5-Air leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMistral Large 2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 16.5%9.2%GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 73.3%48.6%GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-HLESource 6.8%4.0%GLM-4.5-Air leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -62.5%-34.0%Mistral Large 2 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.5%20.1%Mistral Large 2 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 92.3%67.8%Mistral Large 2 leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMistral Large 2Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1179Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirMistral Large 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 37.6%31.2%GLM-4.5-Air leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.5-Air and Mistral Large 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.5-Air and Mistral Large 2 today?

GLM-4.5-Air: $0.20 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 2: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.