Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen2.5-72B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
47.7/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.5-Air #133 (Supported); Qwen2.5-72B #101 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen2.5-72B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to GLM-4.5-Air; 0 to Qwen2.5-72B.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
GLM-4.5-Air only
12
Qwen2.5-72B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen2.5-72B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen2.5-72B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GLM-4.5-Air is priced at $0.20 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen2.5-72B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.5-AirQwen2.5-72BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.5-Air$0.2 input / $1.1 outputQwen2.5-72B$0 input / $0 outputQwen2.5-72B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.5-Air106 tok/sQwen2.5-72BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.5-Air1.18 sQwen2.5-72BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.5-Air128KQwen2.5-72B128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen2.5-72BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 46.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen2.5-72BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 30.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen2.5-72BResult
AA-LCRSource 43.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen2.5-72BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 16.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 73.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 6.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -62.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 92.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen2.5-72BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1176Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirQwen2.5-72BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 37.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen2.5-72B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.5-Air and Qwen2.5-72B today?

GLM-4.5-Air: $0.20 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens Qwen2.5-72B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.