Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.5 vs Holo3.1-4B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
57.56/100
No comparison
H Company
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.5 #68 (Estimated); Holo3.1-4B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.5 and Holo3.1-4B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GLM-4.5; 1 to Holo3.1-4B.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
GLM-4.5 only
1
Holo3.1-4B only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.5 and Holo3.1-4B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GLM-4.5 is priced at $0.60 input / $2.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-4B. Holo3.1-4B has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for GLM-4.5.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.5Holo3.1-4BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.5$0.6 input / $2.2 outputHolo3.1-4B$0 input / $0 outputHolo3.1-4B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.551 tok/sHolo3.1-4BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.51.45 sHolo3.1-4BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.5128KHolo3.1-4B262KHolo3.1-4B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Holo3.1-4BResult
AndroidWorldSource 71.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.5Holo3.1-4BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1200Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.5 and Holo3.1-4B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.5 and Holo3.1-4B today?

GLM-4.5: $0.60 input / $2.20 output per 1M tokens Holo3.1-4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.