Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.56/100
Margin
1.1pts
winning →
Xiaomi
58.62/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.5 #68 (Estimated); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2.5 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GLM-4.5; 10 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
1
GLM-4.5 only
0
MiMo-V2.5 only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for GLM-4.5.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2.5
CategoryGLM-4.5ΔMiMo-V2.5
AgenticGLM-4.5Not measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.565.8
CodingGLM-4.5Not measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.556.1
MultimodalGLM-4.5Not measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.579.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.5$0.6 input / $2.2 outputMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.551 tok/sMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.51.45 sMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.5128KMiMo-V2.51MMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.5Result
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.5Result
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.5MiMo-V2.5Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12001291MiMo-V2.5 leads
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.5 and MiMo-V2.5 today?

GLM-4.5: $0.60 input / $2.20 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.