Model comparison

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1

Data verified July 21, 2026

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.

GLM-4.7-Flash

Z.AI

N/A

No comparison

Laguna S 2.1

Poolside

N/A

0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7-Flash #106 (Supported); Laguna S 2.1 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.7-Flash and Laguna S 2.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GLM-4.7-Flash; 6 to Laguna S 2.1.

Updated July 21, 2026

Shared results: 0
GLM-4.7-Flash only: 0
Laguna S 2.1 only: 6
Comparable categories: 0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.7-Flash and Laguna S 2.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GLM-4.7-Flash yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Laguna S 2.1 is priced at $0.10 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7-Flash. Laguna S 2.1 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7-Flash.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metric	GLM-4.7-Flash	Laguna S 2.1	Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens	GLM-4.7-Flash$0 input / $0 output	Laguna S 2.1$0.1 input / $0.2 output	GLM-4.7-Flash has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per second	GLM-4.7-Flash95 tok/s	Laguna S 2.1Not available	A complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first token	GLM-4.7-Flash0.91 s	Laguna S 2.1Not available	A complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokens	GLM-4.7-Flash200K	Laguna S 2.11M	Laguna S 2.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic

2 benchmarks

Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Laguna S 2.1	Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source	—	70.2%	Not comparable
Toolathlon-VerifiedSource	—	49.7%	Not comparable

Coding

4 benchmarks

Benchmark	GLM-4.7-Flash	Laguna S 2.1	Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source	—	70.2%	Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource	—	78.5%	Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource	—	59.4%	Not comparable
deepSweSource	—	40.4%	Not comparable

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.7-Flash and Laguna S 2.1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.7-Flash and Laguna S 2.1 today?

GLM-4.7-Flash: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Laguna S 2.1: $0.10 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Z.AI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.