Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7-Flash #106 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GLM-4.7-Flash; 15 to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- GLM-4.7-Flash only
- 0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
- 15
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GLM-4.7-Flash yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
GLM-4.7-Flash has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GLM-4.7-Flash$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GLM-4.7-Flash95 tok/s | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/s | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GLM-4.7-Flash0.91 s | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 s | GLM-4.7-Flash reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GLM-4.7-Flash200K | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B32K | GLM-4.7-Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 14.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 75.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 10.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -51.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 17.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 82.9% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 71.1% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B today?
GLM-4.7-Flash: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.