benchlm.ai

GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen2.5-1M

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

Qwen2.5-1M wins overall with a score of 66 vs 56 (10 point difference).Qwen2.5-1M wins 4 out of 4 categories.

GLM-4.7-Flash

CreatorZhipu AI
TypeOpen Weight
Context200K
Score56

Qwen2.5-1M

CreatorAlibaba
TypeOpen Weight
Context1M
Score66

Knowledge

Qwen2.5-1M

GLM-4.7-Flash

63.8

Qwen2.5-1M

81.8

66
MMLU
84
65
GPQA
83
63
SuperGPQA
81
61
OpenBookQA
79

Coding

Qwen2.5-1M

GLM-4.7-Flash

58

Qwen2.5-1M

76

58
HumanEval
76

Mathematics

Qwen2.5-1M

GLM-4.7-Flash

65

Qwen2.5-1M

84

66
AIME 2023
85
68
AIME 2024
87
67
AIME 2025
86
62
HMMT Feb 2023
81
64
HMMT Feb 2024
83
63
HMMT Feb 2025
82
65
BRUMO 2025
84

Reasoning

Qwen2.5-1M

GLM-4.7-Flash

62

Qwen2.5-1M

80

63
SimpleQA
81
61
MuSR
79

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-1M?

Qwen2.5-1M scores higher overall with 66 vs 56, a difference of 10 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-1M?

Qwen2.5-1M leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 81.8 vs 63.8.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-1M?

Qwen2.5-1M leads in coding with an average score of 76 vs 58.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-1M?

Qwen2.5-1M leads in math with an average score of 84 vs 65.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-1M?

Qwen2.5-1M leads in reasoning with an average score of 80 vs 62.

Related Comparisons

GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.4GLM-4.7-Flash vs Gemini 3.1 ProGLM-4.7-Flash vs Claude Opus 4.6GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok 4.1GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-5.2