GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen2.5-VL-32B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

GLM-4.7-Flash wins overall with a score of 56 vs 34 (22 point difference).GLM-4.7-Flash wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

63.8

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40.8

66
MMLU
43
65
GPQA
42
63
SuperGPQA
40
61
OpenBookQA
38

Coding

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

58

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

35

58
HumanEval
35

Mathematics

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

65

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

42

66
AIME 2023
43
68
AIME 2024
45
67
AIME 2025
44
62
HMMT Feb 2023
39
64
HMMT Feb 2024
41
63
HMMT Feb 2025
40
65
BRUMO 2025
42

Reasoning

GLM-4.7-Flash

GLM-4.7-Flash

62

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40

63
SimpleQA
41
61
MuSR
39

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher overall with 56 vs 34, a difference of 22 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 63.8 vs 40.8.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in coding with an average score of 58 vs 35.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in math with an average score of 65 vs 42.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-4.7-Flash leads in reasoning with an average score of 62 vs 40.