Model comparison
GLM-4.7 vs Grok Build 0.1
Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #32; Grok Build 0.1 unranked
Evidence parity. GLM-4.7 and Grok Build 0.1 share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 17 results are unique to GLM-4.7; 1 to Grok Build 0.1.
Updated July 14, 2026- Shared results
- 14
- GLM-4.7 only
- 17
- Grok Build 0.1 only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GLM-4.7 and Grok Build 0.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Grok Build 0.1 is priced at $1.00 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7. Grok Build 0.1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | GLM-4.745.7 | MarginNo overlap | Grok Build 0.1Not measured |
| Coding | GLM-4.773.8 | MarginNo overlap | Grok Build 0.1Not measured |
| Knowledge | GLM-4.752.1 | MarginNo overlap | Grok Build 0.1Not measured |
| Math | GLM-4.71.8 | MarginNo overlap | Grok Build 0.1Not measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GLM-4.7 | Grok Build 0.1 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GLM-4.7$0 input / $0 output | Grok Build 0.1$1 input / $2 output | GLM-4.7 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GLM-4.782 tok/s | Grok Build 0.1Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GLM-4.71.10 s | Grok Build 0.1Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GLM-4.7200K | Grok Build 0.1256K | Grok Build 0.1 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok Build 0.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 41% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 52% | — | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | 15.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 25.4% | 28.0% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| Tau2-TelecomSource | 95.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 39.95% | 49.15% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 33.3% | 35.6% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 1165 | 1211 | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
Coding7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok Build 0.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 73.8% | — | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | 84.9% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-RebenchSource | 58.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 45.3% | 51.5% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 31.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 45.1% | 50.2% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA LiveCodeBenchSource | 89.4% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok Build 0.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 85.7% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 84.3% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 24.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 33.7% | 39.8% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 85.9% | 89.5% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 25.1% | 36.0% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -34.6% | 7.4% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 29.3% | 51.4% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 90.3% | 90.5% | GLM-4.7 leads |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Grok Build 0.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 67.9% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GLM-4.7 and Grok Build 0.1 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GLM-4.7 and Grok Build 0.1 today?
GLM-4.7: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Grok Build 0.1: $1.00 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.