Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GLM-4.7
69
Hy3 Preview
62
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.
Agentic
+9.1 difference
Coding
+10.6 difference
Knowledge
+13.9 difference
GLM-4.7
Hy3 Preview
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
N/A
200K
256K
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Hy3 Preview only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 60.6 against 46.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 54.4%. Hy3 Preview does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Hy3 Preview gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 54.4%.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 46.7. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 60. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Hy3 Preview has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.4 versus 45.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.