Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs MiniCPM5-1B

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

GLM-4.7 leads for most workloads.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

GLM-4.7

63

VS

MiniCPM5-1B

36

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #34 · MiniCPM5-1B unranked

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniCPM5-1B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkGLM-4.7ΔMiniCPM5-1B
Math1.8 31.333.1
Knowledge52.1 8.044.1
Agentic45.7
Coding73.8
Inst. Following58.5

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

MiniCPM5-1B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

N/A

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (first answer)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

131K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniCPM5-1B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.

GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 63 to 36. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 52.1 against 44.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 84.3% to 48.9%. MiniCPM5-1B does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-4.7 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 131K for MiniCPM5-1B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or MiniCPM5-1B?

GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 36. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 84.3% and 48.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or MiniCPM5-1B?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 52.1 versus 44.1. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7 or MiniCPM5-1B?

MiniCPM5-1B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 33.1 versus 1.8. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.