Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

GLM-4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

61.16/100
Margin
8.2pts
← winning
52.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #42 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B share 15 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to GLM-4.7; 0 to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
15
GLM-4.7 only
15
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GLM-4.7 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
CategoryGLM-4.7ΔNemotron 3 Nano 30B
AgenticGLM-4.745.7MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
CodingGLM-4.775.4MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
KnowledgeGLM-4.751.8MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured
MathGLM-4.71.8MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.7$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.782 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.71.10 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 sGLM-4.7 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.7200KNemotron 3 Nano 30B32KGLM-4.7 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 41%—Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 52%—Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 15.5%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 25.4%2.0%GLM-4.7 leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.9%40.9%GLM-4.7 leads
Gert LabsSource 39.95%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.3%0.0%GLM-4.7 leads
GDPval-AASource 1165484GLM-4.7 leads
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.8%—Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource 84.9%—Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 58.7%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 45.3%14.4%GLM-4.7 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 45.1%29.6%GLM-4.7 leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 89.4%—Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-LCRSource 64.0%33.7%GLM-4.7 leads
CritPtSource 1.7%0.9%GLM-4.7 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
GPQASource 85.7%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 84.3%—Not comparable
HLESource 24.8%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%14.2%GLM-4.7 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 85.9%75.7%GLM-4.7 leads
AA-HLESource 25.1%10.2%GLM-4.7 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -34.6%-51.6%GLM-4.7 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 29.3%17.1%GLM-4.7 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.3%82.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Math
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AIME 2025Source 95.7%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 2.439%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1258—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 67.9%71.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B today?

GLM-4.7: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Z.AI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.