Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

70

VS

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

56

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs53.5

+17.1 difference

Knowledge

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
60.6vs75.5

+14.9 difference

Math

GLM-4.7
95.7vs82.1

+13.6 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 70 to 56. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 70.6 against 53.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 84.9% to 63.2%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 70 to 56. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 84.9% and 63.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 60.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 53.5. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GLM-4.7 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 95.7 versus 82.1. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 28, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.