Model comparison
GLM-4.7 vs Nemotron Ultra 253B
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #32; Nemotron Ultra 253B unranked
Evidence parity. GLM-4.7 and Nemotron Ultra 253B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 19 results are unique to GLM-4.7; 0 to Nemotron Ultra 253B.
Updated July 14, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- GLM-4.7 only
- 19
- Nemotron Ultra 253B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GLM-4.7 and Nemotron Ultra 253B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
GLM-4.7 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Nemotron Ultra 253B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GLM-4.7 | Δ | Nemotron Ultra 253B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | GLM-4.745.7 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron Ultra 253BNot measured |
| Coding | GLM-4.773.8 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron Ultra 253BNot measured |
| Knowledge | GLM-4.752.1 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron Ultra 253BNot measured |
| Math | GLM-4.71.8 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron Ultra 253BNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GLM-4.7 | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GLM-4.7$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron Ultra 253B$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GLM-4.782 tok/s | Nemotron Ultra 253BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GLM-4.71.10 s | Nemotron Ultra 253BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GLM-4.7200K | Nemotron Ultra 253B32K | GLM-4.7 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 41% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 52% | — | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | 15.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 25.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Tau2-TelecomSource | 95.9% | 11.4% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 39.95% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 33.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1165 | — | Not comparable |
Coding7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 73.8% | — | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBenchSource | 84.9% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-RebenchSource | 58.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 45.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 31.8% | 2.3% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 45.1% | 34.7% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA LiveCodeBenchSource | 89.4% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 85.7% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 84.3% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 24.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 33.7% | 9.1% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 85.9% | 72.8% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 25.1% | 8.1% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -34.6% | -45.5% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 29.3% | 19.9% | GLM-4.7 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 90.3% | 81.7% | Nemotron Ultra 253B leads |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1260 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Nemotron Ultra 253B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 67.9% | 38.2% | GLM-4.7 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GLM-4.7 and Nemotron Ultra 253B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GLM-4.7 and Nemotron Ultra 253B today?
GLM-4.7: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron Ultra 253B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.