Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

69

VS

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

66

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 unranked · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #23

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
45.3vs51.5

+6.2 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs66.9

+3.7 difference

Knowledge

GLM-4.7
60.6vs60.5

+0.1 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

N/A

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

GLM-4.7 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 69 versus 66. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 70.6 against 66.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 51.5%. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 51.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 60.5. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 66.9. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 51.5 versus 45.3. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 28, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.