Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

72

VS

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

64

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 unranked · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #13

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
45.3vs51.5

+6.2 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs66.9

+3.7 difference

Knowledge

GLM-4.7
60.6vs60.5

+0.1 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

N/A

Speed

82 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

N/A

Context Window

200K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 64. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 70.6 against 66.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is VITA-Bench, 15.5% to 35.6%. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is VITA-Bench, where the scores are 15.5% and 35.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.6 versus 60.5. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 66.9. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 51.5 versus 45.3. Inside this category, VITA-Bench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.