Skip to main content

GLM-5.2 vs GPT-4.1 mini

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.2

94

VS

GPT-4.1 mini

45

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.2 #9 · GPT-4.1 mini unranked

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 mini only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

GLM-5.2
62.1vs23.6

+38.5 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.2
67.2vs64.2

+3.0 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.2

GPT-4.1 mini

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$0.4 / $1.6

Speed

N/A

80 t/s

Latency (first answer)

N/A

0.76s

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 mini only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 62.1 against 23.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 91.2% to 64.2%.

GLM-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.40 input / $1.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 mini. That is roughly 2.8x on output cost alone. GLM-5.2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4.1 mini is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4.1 mini?

GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 94 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 91.2% and 64.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4.1 mini?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.2 versus 64.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or GPT-4.1 mini?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 23.6. GPT-4.1 mini stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.