Skip to main content

GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.4

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.2

94

VS

GPT-5.4

88

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.2 #9 · GPT-5.4 #19

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1.05M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5.2
81vs77

+4.0 difference

Coding

GLM-5.2
62.1vs57.7

+4.4 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.2
67.2vs66.1

+1.1 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.2

GPT-5.4

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$2.5 / $15

Speed

N/A

74 t/s

Latency (first answer)

N/A

151.79s

Context Window

1M

1.05M

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1.05M context window.

GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 88. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 62.1 against 57.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 81% to 75.1%.

GPT-5.4 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5.2. That is roughly 3.4x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 1M for GLM-5.2.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4?

GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 94 to 88. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 81% and 75.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.2 versus 66.1. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 57.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.2 or GPT-5.4?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 77. Inside this category, Toolathlon is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.