Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GLM-5.2
94
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
85
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.2 #9 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro unranked
Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5-Pro only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+12.6 difference
Coding
+4.9 difference
Knowledge
+19.2 difference
GLM-5.2
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
$1.4 / $4.4
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick GLM-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5-Pro only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 85. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 67.2 against 48. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 81% to 68.4%.
GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 94 to 85. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 81% and 68.4%.
GLM-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.2 versus 48. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GLM-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 57.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GLM-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 68.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.