Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-5-Turbo vs Holo3-35B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Benchmark data for one or both models is coming soon. This page currently shows metadata and pricing where BenchLM has it, and score-level comparisons will populate as public benchmark results land.
19/100
Margin
55.0pts
winning →
H Company
74/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. GLM-5-Turbo and Holo3-35B-A3B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to GLM-5-Turbo; 1 to Holo3-35B-A3B.

Updated July 14, 2026
Shared results
0
GLM-5-Turbo only
14
Holo3-35B-A3B only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-5-Turbo and Holo3-35B-A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GLM-5-Turbo has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-5-TurboHolo3-35B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-5-Turbo$1.2 input / $4 outputHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-5-TurboNot availableHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-5-TurboNot availableHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-5-Turbo200KHolo3-35B-A3B64KGLM-5-Turbo lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboHolo3-35B-A3BResult
Claw-EvalSource 55.8%Not comparable
Tau2-TelecomSource 98.5%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 82.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboHolo3-35B-A3BResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 33.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 43.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboHolo3-35B-A3BResult
AA-LCRSource 60.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboHolo3-35B-A3BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 38.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 25.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -15.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 29.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 62.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboHolo3-35B-A3BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1306Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboHolo3-35B-A3BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 73.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-5-Turbo and Holo3-35B-A3B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-5-Turbo and Holo3-35B-A3B today?

GLM-5-Turbo: $1.20 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens Holo3-35B-A3B: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 14, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.