Skip to main content

Model comparison

GLM-5-Turbo vs MiniMax M3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

66.84/100
Margin
3.0pts
winning →
MiniMax
69.8/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5-Turbo unranked; MiniMax M3 #18

BenchAlign evidence: GLM-5-Turbo supported; MiniMax M3 supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-5-Turbo and MiniMax M3 share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GLM-5-Turbo; 31 to MiniMax M3.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
14
GLM-5-Turbo only
0
MiniMax M3 only
31
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GLM-5-Turbo and MiniMax M3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GLM-5-Turbo is priced at $1.20 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M3. MiniMax M3 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-5-Turbo.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GLM-5-Turbo and MiniMax M3
CategoryGLM-5-TurboΔMiniMax M3
AgenticGLM-5-TurboNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M372.3
CodingGLM-5-TurboNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M372.2
MathGLM-5-TurboNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M385.7
MultimodalGLM-5-TurboNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiniMax M364.9

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-5-TurboMiniMax M3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-5-Turbo$1.2 input / $4 outputMiniMax M3$0.3 input / $1.2 outputMiniMax M3 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-5-TurboNot availableMiniMax M3Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-5-TurboNot availableMiniMax M3Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-5-Turbo200KMiniMax M31MMiniMax M3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboMiniMax M3Result
Claw-EvalSource 55.8%74.5%MiniMax M3 leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 98.5%88.9%GLM-5-Turbo leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 66%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 83.5%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 70.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.2%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 35.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 44.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1395Not comparable
GDPval rubricsSource 74.7%Not comparable
BankerToolBenchSource 76.1%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 19.8%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source 4.6%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 1110Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 32.1%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 6.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboMiniMax M3Result
Terminal-Bench HardSource 33.3%42.4%MiniMax M3 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 43.6%45.4%MiniMax M3 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 59%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 66.0%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 42.1%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 58.6%Not comparable
VIBE V2Source 50.1%Not comparable
SVG-BenchSource 63.7%Not comparable
KernelBench HardSource 28.8%Not comparable
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source 65.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboMiniMax M3Result
AA-LCRSource 60.7%74.0%MiniMax M3 leads
CritPtSource 0.3%3.7%MiniMax M3 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboMiniMax M3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 38.1%44.4%MiniMax M3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.7%92.9%MiniMax M3 leads
AA-HLESource 25.4%37.1%MiniMax M3 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -15.1%1.4%MiniMax M3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 29.0%15.0%GLM-5-Turbo leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 62.2%16.1%MiniMax M3 leads
AA Openness IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboMiniMax M3Result
USAMO 2026Source 85.7%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboMiniMax M3Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 13061294GLM-5-Turbo leads
OfficeQA ProSource 45.1%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source 91.6%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 78.1%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 84.6%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 85.4%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 78.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-5-TurboMiniMax M3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 73.2%82.9%MiniMax M3 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GLM-5-Turbo and MiniMax M3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GLM-5-Turbo and MiniMax M3 today?

GLM-5-Turbo: $1.20 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M3: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.