Skip to main content

GLM-5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5

77

VS

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

64

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5 #10 · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B #13

Pick GLM-5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5
56.2vs51.5

+4.7 difference

Coding

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
63.2vs66.9

+3.7 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5
70.7vs60.5

+10.2 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

N/A

Speed

74 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.64s

N/A

Context Window

200K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

GLM-5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 77 to 64. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 70.7 against 60.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MCP Atlas, 31.1% to 62.8%. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for GLM-5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 77 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MCP Atlas, where the scores are 31.1% and 62.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.7 versus 60.5. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 66.9 versus 63.2. Inside this category, SWE Multilingual is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

GLM-5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.2 versus 51.5. Inside this category, MCP Atlas is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.